As summer envelops the Northern Hemisphere and temperatures rise, so does the anticipation for the next iPhone iteration, tentatively dubbed the iPhone 17. However, amidst this growing excitement, there’s a vexing issue on my mind—specifically, the absence of any credible rumors suggesting that the iPhone 17 and its larger counterpart, the iPhone 17 Plus, will feature a high-refresh rate display, a feature I’ve long advocated for.
For years now, I have expressed my discontent with Apple’s conservative approach to display technology in its standard iPhone models. It wasn’t until the launch of the iPhone 13 Pro that we finally saw high-refresh rate displays make their way into the premium line of devices. In stark contrast, Android manufacturers have boldly embraced 90Hz and even 120Hz displays for several years. These advancements have become standard on a multitude of flagship Android devices, frequently accompanied by adaptive refresh rates that optimize performance and conserve power. This has left my beloved iPhone feeling increasingly outdated, especially when considering the price point of the iPhone 16.
The hope I cling to is that Apple will finally pivot toward incorporating high-refresh rate displays in its standard and Plus models, ideally with the introduction of the iPhone 17. A recent article by a colleague raised an interesting point about whether one truly needs to opt for the Pro versions of the iPhone. While I see merit in this view, I cannot overlook the glaring limitations of the non-Pro models—the lack of high-refresh displays and telephoto camera capabilities. Both features greatly enhance the user experience for those of us who are accustomed to the premium offerings.
Take for example the telephoto camera. It’s not an absolute necessity for every user, yet it does add a level of versatility to photography that many find appealing. However, I find myself far less forgiving when it comes to the display’s refresh rate. The stark 60Hz display on standard iPhones feels like a relic in this age of rapidly advancing technology. While I fully recognize that not everyone in the broader consumer market prioritizes display specs—particularly those less attuned to tech—a disparity still exists.
It’s important to acknowledge that Apple’s iOS contributes significantly to the smoothness and responsiveness of the iPhone experience, even with a 60Hz setup. That said, using a 60Hz display inevitably limits the experience as we become accustomed to higher refresh rates from competing devices. A high-refresh display not only enriches the visual experience but also reduces eye strain, making prolonged use more comfortable.
Having transitioned between various devices sporting 90Hz and 120Hz displays, I can unequivocally say that reverting to 60Hz would feel markedly jarring. While Apple may tout the longevity benefits of a lower refresh rate for battery efficiency, it doesn’t negate the compelling arguments in favor of higher refresh rates. The industry is rapidly moving towards higher standards; it’s high time that Apple aligns with these trends, especially as we approach 2025.
Imagine if Apple set the standard for iPhones to feature 90Hz or 120Hz displays across all models, not just the Pro line. This shift could catalyze not only improved performance—helping manufacturers develop more efficient displays—but could also reduce eye fatigue, helping users engage with their devices longer without discomfort. A smooth, fluid experience can make a world of difference, particularly as we rely increasingly on our smartphones for work, communication, and entertainment.
In today’s smartphone ecosystem, the advantages of high-refresh rates are undeniable. Whether you’re scrolling through social media feeds, playing graphically intense games, or simply navigating the operating system, a higher refresh rate drastically enhances the fluidity of interactions. Take, for instance, the adaptive display technologies employed in many Android devices, where the screen dynamically adjusts its refresh rate depending on the action taking place. This not only boosts performance but also optimizes battery life—two goals that any tech-savvy user can appreciate.
The market is flooded with remarkable examples of high-refresh-rate smartphones that stand out for their visual appeal and performance. The Apple iPhone 16 Pro and Pro Max boast some of the finest high-refresh-rate OLED displays currently available, offering crisp visuals and swift response times that make every interaction a delight. By adopting a standard refresh rate of at least 90Hz for non-Pro iPhones, Apple could leverage its expertise to make improvements across the board.
If the iPhone 17 is to serve as a meaningful update rather than an incremental change, it must embrace new technologies—starting with high-refresh displays. A transition to faster refresh rates would not only enhance the user experience but also invigorate the iPhone lineup, reaffirming Apple’s position as a leader in innovation.
Moreover, as iOS evolves—potentially to iOS 26 with the launch of the iPhone 17—having a high-refresh display would better showcase the software’s capabilities. The fluid animations, transitions, and overall responsiveness of the operating system would be amplified by a faster refresh rate, allowing users to fully appreciate the enhancements that come with new software features. This alignment of hardware and software is what has traditionally set Apple apart in a crowded market.
Moreover, consumers are becoming increasingly discerning. As competitors continue to roll out devices with high-refresh rates at competitive prices, Apple risks losing its edge if it remains anchored to outdated specifications. This pressure can be beneficial; it often drives innovation and compels companies to do better. When consumers have options that deliver superior experiences at lower price points, staying competitive is paramount.
But how exactly would this shift benefit everyday users? For starters, an increase in refresh rate can significantly improve day-to-day tasks. Whether you’re reading, scrolling, or playing games, a high-refresh rate ensures a noticeable smoothness that enhances overall satisfaction. Furthermore, as developers create more immersive apps and games, a device capable of higher refresh rates can elevate the experience drastically, accommodating richer graphics and faster interactions.
To substantiate the case for higher refresh rates, let’s consider some of the best devices currently available. The Samsung Galaxy S25 series, for example, comes equipped with impressive displays that excel in responsiveness. Similarly, the Google Pixel 9 Pro offers a dynamic refresh rate that adjusts based on user activity, demonstrating tech that Apple could adopt across its product range.
As I envision the release of the iPhone 17, I implore Apple to reconsider its approach to display technology. Making higher refresh rates standard across all devices will not only close the gap with competitors but will also significantly enhance user experiences for those who might hesitate to invest in the Pro models. The narrative surrounding Apple’s innovation has always hinged upon the elegance of its technologies and its user experience—what better way to fortify that narrative than to elevate something as fundamental as the display?
In conclusion, as we await the unveiling of the iPhone 17, I find myself torn between hope and frustration. We are at a critical juncture in smartphone evolution, a moment where embracing modern display technology could distinguish Apple’s offerings in a sea of competitors. The sluggish adherence to a 60Hz refresh rate feels increasingly like an oversight in an age where user experiences can be so dramatically enhanced through technological advancements. A simple upgrade to 90Hz or 120Hz could transform the iPhone landscape, enriching the lives of everyday users who have come to expect more from their devices. In a rapidly evolving tech world, let’s hope the iPhone 17 signifies a bold step forward into a refreshingly higher standard.
Source link
