Over 30 countries have committed to using nuclear energy to help achieve global climate goals. However, nuclear energy is still a controversial source due to concerns about radioactive waste, safety, and high costs.
At a recent nuclear energy summit in Brussels, 34 countries, including the US, China, Japan, France, Britain, and Saudi Arabia, pledged to fully explore the potential of nuclear energy by extending the lifetime of existing reactors, building new nuclear power plants, and deploying advanced reactors.
While nuclear energy does not produce greenhouse gas emissions, its environmental impact and waste management pose challenges. It still needs to prove itself as a safe and cost-effective alternative to fossil fuels.
Nuclear energy doesn’t generate the greenhouse gas emissions heating up the planet, but the environmental footprint of its supply chain and waste creates other problems
Most nations have committed to transitioning to clean energy to combat climate change. While renewables like solar and wind are becoming more affordable, finding backup sources of energy remains a challenge.
Advocates of nuclear energy claim it complements renewables by providing continuous electricity generation. They emphasize the importance of attracting investment to enhance nuclear energy usage.
Despite past incidents like the Fukushima Daiichi disaster, some countries continue to prioritize nuclear energy but also aim to invest in renewables and prioritize safety.
While there is growing interest in next-generation nuclear reactors, concerns remain about waste management and costs associated with their construction.
Environmental groups like Greenpeace continue to protest against nuclear energy due to concerns about safety, cost, and environmental impact.
