In a recent statement, Tim Sweeney, the CEO of Epic Games, criticized Apple’s “Find My” service for its alleged intrusiveness and referred to it as “super creepy surveillance tech” that “shouldn’t exist.” Sweeney shared a personal experience where his Mac laptop was stolen, and years later, he discovered the location of the thief through Apple’s Find My service. The incident left Sweeney feeling uncomfortable and led him to turn off Find My on all his devices.
Sweeney’s comments triggered a mixed response from the online community. Some users argued that having access to such tracking technology is essential for security purposes. They compared the situation to having security footage of someone taking packages off your porch and suggested that Sweeney’s reaction was an exaggeration. There were even speculations that Sweeney criticized Apple to create a negative image for the company due to ongoing lawsuits.
However, Sweeney emphasized that the tracking of devices should be mediated by due process of law and not carried out in a vigilante fashion. He argued that people have a right to privacy, including second-hand device buyers and even thieves. The recovery of lost or stolen devices should be handled through lawful channels rather than exposing device owners to personal confrontations.
Some users pointed out the irony in Sweeney’s critique, referencing an article that highlighted Epic’s own privacy policies, which resulted in a $520 million fine for violating children’s privacy. This raised questions about the sincerity of Sweeney’s statements and his intentions behind criticizing Apple.
MacRumors presented data from a 2014 report that showed a significant decrease in iPhone thefts after the introduction of Apple’s Activation Lock feature. Activation Lock prevents the disabling of Find My without a password, making it difficult for thieves to sell or use stolen devices. This feature has been instrumental in reducing theft and increasing the chances of recovering lost devices.
However, Sweeney argued that the issue should not be idealized as a battle between good guys tracking criminals. He emphasized the potential harm that could arise from users being directed to the homes of innocent individuals due to inaccuracies or misuse of the technology. Sweeney raised concerns about the presence of families and children in these homes, suggesting that it may not be appropriate for platforms to enable potentially dangerous physical confrontations through GPS and other tracking technologies.
To support his argument, Sweeney shared a quote from Steve Jobs, where the late Apple co-founder expressed concerns about the safety of younger users. Jobs alluded to worrisome scenarios, such as a 14-year-old being stalked or something terrible happening due to the capabilities of their phone.
In conclusion, Tim Sweeney’s criticism of Apple’s Find My service has stirred a significant debate about the balance between device tracking for security purposes and privacy rights. While some support the use of such technology to track stolen devices and deter thieves, others are concerned about the potential risks and unintended consequences of misuse. It is clear that there are valid arguments on both sides, and finding a middle ground that protects individual privacy while still enabling effective device recovery will be crucial. Ultimately, discussions and advancements in this area will shape the future of device tracking and privacy practices.
Source link
